Company & Commercial

Navigating the gig economy and the choppy channel across to franchising

Businesses looking to expand may consider a franchise model as the solution to future growth without the demands of capital investment.

09 Jun 2022

Team name
Danielle Ward

Danielle Ward

But getting franchising terms right is increasingly vital against the backdrop of the gig economy, with challenges as to whether individuals are truly self-employed contractors or could be classed as workers or employees and due to receive associated in-service benefits.

Franchising is a long-standing business model, with well-known examples such as fast-food outlets McDonald’s, KFC or Subway, through hotels, estate agents and cleaning companies to fitness centres.  It allows the original business, as franchisor, to grant a franchisee the rights to replicate the business in new territory and to trade under a brand’s well-established name.   The franchisee generally pays a fee to buy the rights in the first place, with a continuing commitment of fees or commissions to the franchisor.

Buying the franchise rights and getting the territory off the ground may involve creating a team, setting up premises and finding your own customers through direct marketing, but in the case of courier delivery service DPD, their franchise model allows self-employed owner-driver franchisees (ODFs) to act as delivery agents by tapping into the existing customer base and operational infrastructure of the nationwide business.

As part of the DPD franchise agreement, ODFs are required to have any substitute drivers approved by the company before handing over any responsibilities.  In the case of Stojsavljevic and another v DPD Group UK Ltd this process was challenged, with ODFs arguing that it undermined any self-employed status, making them workers or employees of DPD.  They said the reality of the franchise agreement was that they were contracted as individual drivers, solely responsible for undertaking the services.

But an employment tribunal ruled against the drivers, a decision later upheld by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), saying that a key element of worker status is that an individual personally undertakes to perform the work or services themselves.  In the case of DPD franchisees, there was no restriction on supplying a substitute driver, only that the company had to be satisfied that the substitutes met minimum requirements.

The case reflects shifts in the broader economy towards so-called ‘gig’ work – short term work commitments or freelance contracts, typically paid on a per job basis – and the associated challenges around whether those fulfilling the jobs are self-employed or are workers or employees, with rights such as holiday and sickness pay.

Notable cases in the UK include successful action by drivers seeking worker status and rights from Uber, Deliveroo and Addison Lee.  As a result, many such companies are reportedly considering franchise programmes as an alternative.

M&P Commentary

Danielle Ward, company law specialist at Mullis & Peake, said:

Franchising may be seen as a get-out of jail card for this sector, but any employment tribunal will take a detailed look at both the clauses that constitute the agreement and how the relationship operates in practice.

“And it’s not just about substitution rights, as in the DPD case, as recent cases have focused on aspects such as the ability to determine pricing, the degree of integration into the franchisor business, and whether franchisees are subject to centralised policies or terms.”


Ranked highly in Romford and Brentwood for solicitor firms

Dispute resolution
I am extremely grateful for the service I received, with professional help & advice these past years.
Mr North
Trusts and Probate
We would like to thank Anne and Manzurul for helping to make our probate application go smoothly and efficiently. We found the process very professional.
M McDermott
From start to finish our needs were handled with all due care and attention to detail.
Residential Property
Svetlana at Mullis & Peake recently handled our divorce transactions and house purchase, no fuss, straight forward advice, great communication and handled efficiently.
Residential Property
Trusts and Probate
Excellent service and very good advice on both recent matters. Mullis & Peake have acted for our family for many years and have proved very professional on each occasion
Residential Property
Mullis & Peake dealt with both the sale and purchase for my mum's properties. Paul is professional, helpful and efficient. Explained all the processes in a timely manner. Top quali...
I've found the service I've received at Mullis and Peake to be courteous, professional and highly recommendable.
Special thanks to Roisin McCorry for her professionalism, resolve, patience, and the support she provided during this very difficult time.
Dispute resolution
Extremely satisfied with service received from Mullis & Peake. I would thoroughly recommend their service as they were recommended to me.

Related News insights

Charity & Fundraising, Mullis & Peake
London Legal Walk 2022
Legal, Residential Property, Lease Extension, Leasehold Enfranchisement
Update on leasehold reform and ground rents
Legal, Residential Property
Buying your first home – what to expect
Movers & Shakers, Mullis & Peake
Above and Beyond June 2022