Home Link Logo

Why flexibility and rigid rules won’t mix in the workplace

An employment tribunal ruling against a request for home working does not open the way to enforced attendance by employers looking to get staff back to the office.  Instead, employers should be looking to ensure they are as considerate as possible in their approach, and be ready to consider flexible working requests from day one of employment contracts from April this year.
Esther Marshall
Member
Book a call to learn how to protect your property deposit.
Make an enquiry

The case of senior manager Elizabeth Wilson was one of the first to consider hybrid working policies introduced by the pandemic.  It involved a challenge to her employer, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), over its refusal to let Wilson continue to work from home full time post-pandemic.

Wilson asked to work from home full-time when the FCA moved into a post-pandemic hybrid working model, which required staff to spend at least 40 per cent of their time working in the office. A long-standing employee, she pointed to her exemplary record from the start of the pandemic and argued that she did not need to go to the office to manage her team, saying she could do this online.

The tribunal was looking at a specific point of law, which was whether the decision was based on ‘incorrect facts’.  It found in favour of the FCA, agreeing the decision had been based on correct facts and that the organisation had given genuine consideration to the application and provided specific reasons as to how full-time home working by Wilson could have a detrimental impact.

Stay informed with updates and insights

Join our mailing list to receive updates from Mullis & Peake, including the regular newsletter,
tailored information, event invites based on your interests.