Commercial Property

This year marks the centenary of the Law of Property Act 1925 (“LPA 1925”).

Prior to the LPA 1925, there were a number of legal estates in land making transactions convoluted and time consuming. Title was proved by studying decades of historical deeds, each filled with intricate terms. Unpicking and deciphering these deeds was complex and time consuming.

30 Apr 2025

Team name
Joanne Wood

Joanne Wood

There were often disputes regarding ownership and interests in land resulting in spiralling costs and significant delays to transactions.

Reform was needed to establish clear ownership and boost efficiency and to make ownership more accessible to the general public.

The LPA 1925 was therefore introduced and established the Land Registry, a centralised system for recording and maintaining a reliable public record of property ownership and estates. The LPA 1925 also reduced the number of legal estates to just two – freehold and leasehold.

The new law required that only the proprietor could transfer a legal estate and that every transfer needed to be documented.  This brought greater transparency in conveyancing.

Land registration also meant that it became far easier for parties to establish and prove ownership, especially as unregistered title deeds were often lost or missing. It also enabled third parties to search the register to ascertain ownership of land and rights pertaining to it.

As with any change, especially one as radical as this, there were objectors; and several conveyancers left the profession.  However, it has proved its worth and most land is now registered at HM Land Registry. The land which remains unregistered will be registered on any change of ownership or mortgage or can be registered voluntarily by the proprietor, as is often the case.

The Land Registry tries to move with the changing conveyancing landscape and digital market, for example, most applications are now dealt with electronically via their portal rather than by post.

However, the legal landscape continues to evolve. Documents are increasingly being executed in digital format rather than wet signature with a witness, not addressed by the LPA 1925, and the Act also does not take into consideration the move towards commonhold.  As such, reform is again due.

M&P Commentary

Joanne Wood, Head of Property, said:

“With the exception of current delays in applications, some up to 2 years, conveyancers are grateful for its existence and for the structure and surety it provides.”

OUR CLIENTS SAY ABOUT US

Ranked highly in Romford and Brentwood for solicitor firms

Family
The service I received from Allison was exceptional. Always highly professional and informative.
Virginia
Wills
Mullis and Peake are very efficient, professional and friendly company to deal with. Excellent service throughout.
Brian
Employment
Excellent, swift service from Esther at Mullis & Peake. Showed clear expertise in her field & walked me through everything patiently & thoroughly.
Dan
Company and Commercial
I found the service provided was excellent from start to finish, with our requirements met in a timely manner throughout.
Gary
Wills
Staff very helpful and friendly. Trudi was easy to talk to and to understand the procedure.
Pamela
Dispute resolution
We contacted Martyn to deal with a sensitive Will dispute and we can’t thank him enough for his commitment and hard work.
Salena
Residential Property
Very prompt. Experienced. Expert. Friendly.
Trevor
Commercial Property
Excellent service and far quicker than previous negotiations using a different solicitor.
John
Family
At all times I was kept informed about the progress of the case and everything was completed in a timely fashion.
Melanie
Personal Injury
Martyn undertook and guided me through the lengthy process [of a personal injury case], and after much work, achieved a successful result.
Shirley