Contested Wills and Financial Provision

Concerns about coerced Will rewriting

There has been an ongoing High Court case concerning a challenge brought by a property tycoon’s son over his late father’s £100 million estate.

01 Dec 2021

Team name
Martyn Trenerry

Martyn Trenerry

The case centres on a disputed Will. Louise Reeves is said to have bullied her ailing father into changing his will to leave most of his fortune to her, some £80m.

The claim brought her brother, Bill Reeves, who has seen his inheritance reduced from £30m to personal effects said to be worth £200,000, has accused his sister of having coerced their father into rewriting his Will. This change was said to be out of character and inexplicable, given that he had always had a good relationship with his father and that they were so close he had offered to donate a lung to his father, who had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The Court heard that Kevin Reeves had, from humble beginnings, created a vast personal fortune through a property empire now worth up to £100m. Ms Reeves claims their father wanted her to inherit the fortune as he saw her as the heir to his business empire.

In cases where there might be doubt about the validity of a Will there are a number of grounds on which the Will might be challenged, depending on the circumstances:

  • There might be concerns about the testator’s mental capacity
  • Whether they knew they were making a will or understood its terms
  • Whether a key beneficiary has applied undue influence to procure a Will in their favour
  • There might even be concerns about whether the Will is genuine at all
  • Whether there has been a fraud or forgery.

There is often an overlap between the different grounds, and a challenge to a Will can be brought on several grounds.

M&P Commentary

Martyn Trenerry, specialist in contested wills at Mullis & Peake LLP Solicitors, said:

“A claim to set aside a Will can only succeed where there is compelling and persuasive documentary evidence or evidence from independent third parties to support it. It is therefore vitally important to take legal advice on your position in this respect before embarking on litigation, which can incur significant costs and delay in administering the estate, not to mention the inevitable breakdown of family relations.”

OUR CLIENTS SAY ABOUT US

Ranked highly in Romford and Brentwood for solicitor firms

Family
The service I received from Allison was exceptional. Always highly professional and informative.
Virginia
Wills
Mullis and Peake are very efficient, professional and friendly company to deal with. Excellent service throughout.
Brian
Employment
Excellent, swift service from Esther at Mullis & Peake. Showed clear expertise in her field & walked me through everything patiently & thoroughly.
Dan
Company and Commercial
I found the service provided was excellent from start to finish, with our requirements met in a timely manner throughout.
Gary
Wills
Staff very helpful and friendly. Trudi was easy to talk to and to understand the procedure.
Pamela
Dispute resolution
We contacted Martyn to deal with a sensitive Will dispute and we can’t thank him enough for his commitment and hard work.
Salena
Residential Property
Very prompt. Experienced. Expert. Friendly.
Trevor
Commercial Property
Excellent service and far quicker than previous negotiations using a different solicitor.
John
Family
At all times I was kept informed about the progress of the case and everything was completed in a timely fashion.
Melanie
Personal Injury
Martyn undertook and guided me through the lengthy process [of a personal injury case], and after much work, achieved a successful result.
Shirley

Related News insights

Movers & Shakers, Mullis & Peake
Congratulations and Promotions – April 2024
Legal, Residential Property, Equity release
Mortgage repayments stop UK homeowners from saving more for retirement
Legal, Residential Property, Residential Property
Buying a property with planning permission
Employment Advice, Employment Advice (For Business), Legal, Employment Disputes
Why employers need a reflective response to employee beliefs