Disability Discrimination

The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) has recently issued a decision on the issue of whether, and when, an employer could be said to have knowledge of an employee’s disability.

01 Feb 2023

Team name
Esther Marshall

Esther Marshall

Mr Preston suffered from Primary Reading Epilepsy; a rare form of epilepsy stimulated by reading. As a result he suffered myoclonic seizures on a daily basis. He was employed by Eon Energy Solutions as a customer complaints manager. Before starting employment, he had ticked a box on a form to confirm that he had a disability, but did not specify the nature of it., He was then sent a health questionnaire but he did not complete or return it.

In the winter of 2016/17, Mr Preston had three bouts of winter sickness, as well as an absence due to a back problem. Those absences triggered a sickness procedure. In September 2017 he was signed off from work with “work related stress”. Subsequent Fit Notes also noted “PRE symptoms worsened by stress”. This was the first time that Eon became aware that Mr Preston suffered with PRE.

Eon’s Occupational Health team became involved and adjustments to help Mr Preston manage stress were suggested. In terms of adjustments around PRE, Eon referred the matter to an outside organisation, however Mr Preston did not follow this up or engage at all. In any event, his own neurologist suggested that all that was required was the ability to take regular breaks from reading.

In March 2018, Mr Preston having still not returned to work, a disciplinary procedure was initiated. Eventually he was dismissed on the basis that he was fit to return to work, all reasonable adjustments had been put in place and his refusal to return amounted to gross misconduct. Mr Preston then issued disability discrimination claims in the Employment Tribunal.

There was no dispute that Mr Preston was disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act. The EAT found that nothing disclosed by him prior to his sick leave meant that Eon could, or should, have known about his disability up to that point. The EAT also found that Mr Preston’s sick leave was not related to his disability, that his dismissal was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (i.e. efficient absence management) and that the reason for his dismissal was Mr Preston’s continued refusal to return to work when Occupational Health had said that he was fit to do so.

M&P Commentary

Esther Marshall, Member in the Dispute Resolution team, said:

“This decision gives a useful insight into if and when an employer is deemed to have knowledge of an employee’s disability. Put plainly, if the employee does not tell their employer the nature of their disability and / or what adjustments they require, the employer cannot be expected to make those adjustments. It is interesting that in this case, Mr Preston said that he had told his line manager about his PRE, but this did not translate into the organisation having knowledge of a disability.

If you are at all unsure as to your rights as an employee with a disability, or are an employer needing guidance on your duties to your employees, we can help guide you through this tricky area of the law.”


Ranked highly in Romford and Brentwood for solicitor firms

The service I received from Allison was exceptional. Always highly professional and informative.
Mullis and Peake are very efficient, professional and friendly company to deal with. Excellent service throughout.
Excellent, swift service from Esther at Mullis & Peake. Showed clear expertise in her field & walked me through everything patiently & thoroughly.
Company and Commercial
I found the service provided was excellent from start to finish, with our requirements met in a timely manner throughout.
Staff very helpful and friendly. Trudi was easy to talk to and to understand the procedure.
Dispute resolution
We contacted Martyn to deal with a sensitive Will dispute and we can’t thank him enough for his commitment and hard work.
Residential Property
Very prompt. Experienced. Expert. Friendly.
Commercial Property
Excellent service and far quicker than previous negotiations using a different solicitor.
At all times I was kept informed about the progress of the case and everything was completed in a timely fashion.
Personal Injury
Martyn undertook and guided me through the lengthy process [of a personal injury case], and after much work, achieved a successful result.

Related News insights

Charity & Fundraising, Mullis & Peake
London Legal Walk Completed for 2024
Legal, Wills & Power of Attorney
What Tax May I Have to Pay When I Die?
Movers & Shakers, Mullis & Peake
An Enjoyable Day at the Langtons Summer Concert
Charity & Fundraising, Mullis & Peake
M&P COTY – The Marillac Neurological Care Centre